THE HINDU
Weekly edition
Date: 17-03-1996
Cl: Sociology
The invisible women of Kerala
KALPANA SHARMA
-----------------------------
WHEN you visit Kerala, you feel as if you are entering
another country. In this pre-monsoon period, when most parts of
the country look parched and bone dry, Kerala still maintains its
mantle of green. When, in other states, the hallmark of any
small town is open gutters, piles of dirt and pigs, chickens and
assorted animals wandering on the streets, the equivalent urban
centres in this state look as if they have just been swept with a
strong broom. And the children rarely do you see such a bright
and well-scrubbed bunch.
Yet, there is something missing. You drive through the
streets of a town and you see clusters of men, young and old,
hanging around as they would in any other town. But where are
the women?
Apparently at home, doing their ``homely duties.'' It is
one of the paradoxes of this most advanced state in India that
the status of women, despite the high levels of literacy, remains
surprisingly low. If you ask people involved with movements that
are attempting to change social attitudes why this is so, they
have no clear answer.
U. Janaki is a retired teacher who is also president of
the Kalliasseri panchayat in Kannur district in Kerala. She is
one of four women in the 11-member Panchayat. Kalliasseri is a
model panchayat in many ways where many innovative ways to
enhance the developmental process are being implemented. For
instance, the Panchayat Development Society, a larger body than
the panchayat, has undertaken to map all the resources of the
area under its jurisdiction. This is the first time such an
exercise has ever been undertaken. This knowledge has equipped
them with the tools to decide how best to use these resources and
where to make fresh investments.
I asked Janaki why women were not more visible in
leadership positions in politics or within different movements in
the state. ``They have the burden of house work,'' she said and
then added, ``Most of the husbands don't let them go.'' Although
things were beginning to change, she concurred that the hold of
tradition was stronger. The only women who could go out and
participate in activities such as panchayat meetings were those
old enough to have a daughter-in-law who could perform all the
``homely duties.''But Janaki was hopeful that the generation of
her daughters might see some difference. However, she admitted
that, despite education, even women doctors had to give dowries
in order to find a good groom.
The situation in Kerala gives reason for us to pause.
For decades now, health care and education were seen as the two
magical inputs which could alter the position of women in Indian
society. Yet, in this most advanced state where social
indicators of health and literacy compare favourably with those
of many western nations, women are still crushed under
the
deadweight of tradition which relegates them to the home and the
kitchen. If they go out, it is within limits accepted by this
conservative society. So women doctors, nurses and teachers can
be found in abundance. But women journalists? Hardly any, I was
told.
The subject of the status of women in Kerala has invited
much research. I can recall a decade ago a friend of mine from
Kerala arguing that education by itself did not enhance women's
status. She gave Kerala as an example. Her statements then were
usually greeted with disbelief.
It is only of late that this situation has been
documented in social science research. Also, it is the absence
of women in progressive movements which have set a nationwide
example in other fields that has drawn attention to this lacunae.
The Kerala Sastra Sahitya Parishad (KSSP) is probably one
of the most remarkable movements in this country. It is
democratic and independent. It holds elections every two years.
No person holds a post for longer than that. As a result, there
are few ``names'' that one knows as KSSP leaders. Of its
membership of over 60,000, only a handful work full-time. All
the rest are volunteers. Regardless of their senior positions in
government, as scientists or in the educational system, all of
them introduce themselves merely as ``KSSP activists.''
Yet in KSSP, which has been responsible not only for
inculcating a scientific temper and a love for books,
popularising alternative technologies and spreading environmental
consciousness across the state of Kerala, there are hardly any
women in prominent positions. The women who are working with it
are generally quiet and reticent. You are unlikely to hear their
views at a gathering unless you go out of your way to speak to
them and draw them out.
When asked why this had happened, KSSP activists admit
that this is ``tragic'' and wonder aloud whether there is
something wrong with the education system. Still others suggest
that one of the reasons for the lack of participation of women in
KSSP could be the time at which meetings are generally held. As
most members are volunteers holding full-time jobs, their
meetings can only be held at night. But this is exactly the time
when women have to be at home. They can only step out if they
have another woman who can do their work. And women in such a
position are few.
Is there no way out of this dilemma? Clearly there could
be if enlisting women and drawing them into leadership positions
was a high enough priority of the KSSP. Then whether it is the
time at which meetings are held, or the kind of activities
organised to enlist members, the needs of women would find a
primary position.If the stranglehold of tradition, which is
holding women back despite education, has to be broken then
wishful thinking is not enough. There has to be deliberate p73
strategy to do this.
Nothing illustrated the Kerala paradox more vividly for
me than a visit to a beautiful old traditional Namboodiri home in
the heart of Palakkad. It is set in the midst of several acres
which include a paddy field, a sacred grove, dozens of mango and
jackfruit trees already groaning with fruit and a private pond
with steps leading into it much as you see in Adoor
Gopalakrishnan's films. The house itself, two stories high, is
cool, its black oxide floors a comfort to walk on. There are
four women in the home, of three different generations. Yet the
person doing most of the talking to the visitors is the only man
in the house.
The third generation, consisting of two extremely bright-
eyed young girls, have their own agenda. On the surface, they
maintain a polite demeanour. But once outside the confines of
the home, they decide for the visitors what they should see. And
language, or the lack of a common one, is no barrier. Will this
generation change the situation? Or will they too, after such a
promising start, be married into homes where their ``homely
duties'' will take precedence over all else?
To MSU homepage
To CHSS homepage
To Anthropology Home Page