TOC, Furr, 'The Quarrel of the Roman de la Rose and Fourteenth Century Humanism

Grover C. Furr, The Quarrel of the Roman de la Rose and Fourteenth Century Humanism. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton University, January 1979.
	TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
PREFACE			iii

INTRODUCTION			1

CHAPTER

I.	THE HUMANIST BACKGROUND OF THE QUARREL		35
	A. The Quarrel and Defenses of Poetry		35
	B. The Fourteenth-Century Tradition of Defenses of Poetry by Humanists		55
	C. Attacks Upon Poetry on Grounds of Immorality		60

II.	THE DEFENSE OF ALLEGORY		90

III.	HUMANISTS AND THEIR OPPONENTS In PARIS		143

IV.	WHAT SEEMS OLD IS REALLY NEW: INNOVATION BEHIND THE MASK OF TRADITIONALISM In LATE FOURTEENTH-CENTURY HUMANISM		187

V.	THE PLACE OF THE QUARREL OF THE ROMAN In LITERARY AND CULTURAL HISTORY		222
	A. The Quarrel of the Roman as an Important Episode in the History of Early European Humanism		224
	B. The Quarrel and the Roman as a Document in French Cultural Life		232
	C. Conclusion: The Broader Historical Implications of the Quarrel		237

APPENDICES

1.	THE LITERARY DEBATE OF 1395, INVOLVING CLAMANGES, MONTREUIL, PIETRAMALA, AND PREMIERFAIT		245
	A. The Petrarchan Background		245
	B. The French Debate		250
	1.	Defense of French Culture	253
	2.	Sapientia and Eloquentia	270
2.	THE DEBATE BETWEEN JEAN DE MONTREUIL, GONTIER COL, AMBROGIO DEI MIGLI, AND NICHOLAS DE CLAMANGES, OF 1400-1401		289
	A. The Careers of the Humanists and their Literary Practices		294
	B. Literary Debate as Exercise for Practice		310
	C. The Limits of the Friendships Among Humanists		319
	1.	The Literary Basis of Humanists’ Friendships	332
	2.	The Consciousness of a Distinct Interest, or "Solidarity," Among These Humanists	340
	D. Implications of Conclusions About This Debate for the Study of the Quarrel of the Roman		350
	1.	Humanists’ Literary Activity Indissolubly Linked with Their Economic Activity	350
	2.	The Humanist Literary Debate Often (As Here) A Literary Exercise At Basis	351
	3.	The Mutual Interests of Our Humanists and the "Solidarity" or Unity Among Them	354
	4.	The Limits of the Hostility in Literary Quarrels Among Humanists Determined by Their More Fundamental Unity of Interest, or "Solidarity"	355

3.	THE MINOR LITERARY DEBATES AMONG THE EARLY FRENCH HUMANISTS		359
	A. Debate #1. Jean de Montreuil, Ambrogio dei Migli, Nicholas de Clamanges, and Others		360
	B. Debate #2. Laurent de Premierfait and Jean de Montreuil		378
	C. Debate #3. Jean de Montreuil and Gontier Col		392

BIBLIOGRAPHY			397

DISSERTATION ABSTRACT			422