New Page 1

< A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >

< Messages posted to thread: >

< From                                 Date        >

<                                      15-Oct-99 >

< A new Democrat                       15-Oct-99 >

<                                      15-Oct-99 >

<                                      15-Oct-99 >

<                                      16-Oct-99 >

<                                      16-Oct-99 >

<                                      16-Oct-99 >

<                                      16-Oct-99 >

<                                      18-Oct-99 >

<                                      19-Oct-99 >

<                                      20-Oct-99 >

<                                      21-Oct-99 >

<                                      21-Oct-99 >

< To 4 posts up                        21-Oct-99 >

<                                      22-Oct-99 >

<                                      22-Oct-99 >

<                                      22-Oct-99 >

< Ray                                  22-Oct-99 >

< Frankie                              23-Oct-99 >

<                                      23-Oct-99 >

<                                      23-Oct-99 >

<                                      23-Oct-99 >

< New 3rd ward motto                   23-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

< Socks in Bloomfield.                 24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      24-Oct-99 >

<                                      25-Oct-99 >

<                                      25-Oct-99 >

< to Frank poster                      25-Oct-99 >

< Hooray for the Truth!                25-Oct-99 >

< To the Frank Poster                  25-Oct-99 >

<                                      26-Oct-99 >

<                                      26-Oct-99 >

< Just Curious                         27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

< We the People                        27-Oct-99 >

<                                      27-Oct-99 >

<                                      28-Oct-99 >

<                                      28-Oct-99 >

<                                      28-Oct-99 >

<                                      28-Oct-99 >

<                                      29-Oct-99 >

< Third Ward Resident                  29-Oct-99 >

< Subject: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

AG00100_.gif (1722 bytes) A Vote for Maureen is a Vote for the Future of the Third Ward.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >A new Democrat
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

If there is a ward in Bloomfield that needs a stable councilman/woman its the third ward. Look who was there previously, Gary Iccobacci, who neglected the third ward because he was flexing his ego muscle doing battle with mayor Norton ( Not a Intellectual heavyweight). And what did the third ward get while Gary was off on his crusade to kill the Norton Dragon? Nothing. We got the crap kicked out of us at the council table. Along came Vinnie and kicked Gary out and more things got done in the third ward - and more respectability. Vinnie gets Galioto thrown out and assumes an at large seat and Maureen gets appointed by the council 4-1. And the respectibility continues. Do we really want to return to the misery of the Gary Iccobacci years? No, never!!! Vickie is just a female version of Rich Galioto and Gary Iccobacci rolled into one. Lets keep our hard earned respectibity, lets keep the ball rolling, lets keep Mo .

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

a continuation of nepotism, corruption and using bloomfield to achieve personal ends.

Do not vote for Maureen .

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 15-Oct-99 >

A continuation of nepotism, corruption and using bloomfield to achieve personal ends.

Do not vote for any marionettes.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 16-Oct-99 >

Another hate thread from the toe sniff.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 16-Oct-99 >

No, its campaign hype from the Burnett lot!

Go Mo go!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 16-Oct-99 >

Maureen keep up the good job you are doing.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 16-Oct-99 >

My household's six votes are with you, Maureen!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 18-Oct-99 >

WHo wants to bet that Vicky did a no show for the Watsessing Heights debate? Guess she's still afraid of her tax faux pas being the subject!

Can't wait to hear what her excuse is this time! She likes to scream BIAS whenever its anyone that MArion can't control. Guess she's waiting for DDD to give her a private interview on 34.

Taking bets, beginning now.....

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 19-Oct-99 >

That would explain why the marionettes want their dummy Petrillo at the cameras.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 20-Oct-99 >

So what "corruption" and "nepotism" are you talking about. Give specific examples of each, or shut up.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

Inc. of course.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

And the specific examples are...?

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >To 4 posts up
< Date: 21-Oct-99 >

Hey Bob, Tony Petrillo is far from a dummy. A dummy is someone who would tell a judge this other guy wants to screw his 90 year old mother. Now that's a dummy. Bob do you know of anyone that can fit that description?

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 22-Oct-99 >

Hey! Just Curious, a.k.a. Gary Iacobacci is giving us sound! Maybe he should give channel 34 some lessons!

Go Mo go!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 22-Oct-99 >

JUST CURIOUS IS THE SICKO THAT IS ADDING THE SOUND. NEED PROOF? CLICK ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF YOUR MOUSE. WHEN THE MENU POPS UP, CLICK ON THE "VIEW SOURCE" ITEM WITH THE RIGHT BUTTON. GO DOWN AND READ THE POST THAT CORRESPONDS TO THE ABOVE ONE TWO BACK. IN HIS RUSH TO ADD THEM IN CONSECUTIVE ORDER TO MANY THREADS, HE SIGNED A FEW!

HE ADDED THIS RACEY SOUND. WHY? MAYBE HIS PEOPLE ARE INDEFENSIBLE AND HE IS HOPING THAT WORRALL PULLS THE THREAD.

MAYBE HE JUST PLAIN ENJOYS LISTENING AND WANTS TO SHARE!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 22-Oct-99 >

Rich, notice Bob Arms will not step to your level and answer any of your lies. He knows better than to post about a court case that is not over by a long shot.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >Ray
< Date: 22-Oct-99 >

I will vote for Maureen. I love women. I think it is about time that a laday takes responsibilty. I will be there for you baby.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >Frankie
< Date: 23-Oct-99 >

I love socks! I got married to a fat chick to cover my homo/perv nature. So, I'll vote for her too if you ignore the fact one of your most vocal supporters sniffs socks and equates that with sexual love.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 23-Oct-99 >

A Vote for Maureen is a vote for sanity. Who other than the Vicky-ites would stoop to the levels that have been stooped to!

People post true facts and events about Vicky, and everyone else gets bashed to heck. We have a pattern. Those are the people that she represents and who support her.

No to Vicky! No to all she stands for and who stand behind her!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 23-Oct-99 >

No to Sickies!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 23-Oct-99 >

We pay our taxes so Vicki doesn't have to!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >New 3rd ward motto
< Date: 23-Oct-99 >

Deadbeats R us!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Sockbot Iz YOU, Frank.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Gee, Vicki's only defense from her handlers (self?) is a sock bite.

Duh - we're impressed! NOT!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Hey socksniff, I am not campaigning for either Mo or Vicki. I just want the public to know you are a person who collects dirty childrens' socks, sniffs them and tries to fake having a normal married life to an obese dyke. Politics have nothing to do with it.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

No, libel and mal-intent do!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

How low do you have to stoop for your own mother to disinherit you? We're all finding out right here on these threads.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Maureen you are a winner. Keep up the good work. There is NO WAY big loud mouth can beat you. We are all waiting to see just who the Bloomfield police backs for council seat of the third ward.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... > < From: >< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

__________________________________________________________

Hey, if that's your mission, you're failing miserably. One of two things has to be the truth:

1. People don't care;

2. People may care, but they don't believe your accusations without any proof.

How many times has Frank put his e-mail address up here, and challenged you to write him? Have you? Probably not. You're too afraid he'll know who you are, he'll know all about you and not be afraid to expose you all over the place. His e-mail, in case you forgot it, is ctff3@juno.com

You say this has nothing to do with politics, just your obession with Frank. I'd take bets to say after the election is over, all talk about Frank, Norton, Sholty and Arms will, if not cease, go down considerably. Let me tell you, for a person who claims the man is a sock-sniffer and a pathetic little boy, you spend a lot of time on him. He must really threaten you somehow, just by his existence alone. If God is good, either Frank will find out who you are, or you'll receive your just desserts.

The election will soon be over. Frank will move on to another cause or candidate, and you'll still be here, yelling out rumors, libel and innuendo that nobody cares about. YOU are the pathetic one. If I could line you and Frank up together, I'm sure Frank would come out as the smarter, the more successful and better man.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >Socks in Bloomfield.
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Frank Fleischman has no scruples. He is the one who libels people. A very sad figure, who probably got stuffed in lockers as a kid.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Frank you are the winner. Ignore the nuts talking about you and your wife. None of these people will face you and discuss any subject face to face. After the election you will be able tp post things that you know to be a fact about alot of these people talking about you. You and I both no who they are and I hope you do a job on them. specially the BOE members.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 24-Oct-99 >

Frank, you are a loser. You know it too. Everyone who ever had anything to do with you hates you. You KNOW that is true, sockboy. Quit trying to make others think you are normal.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

No wonder Vicky's handlers didn't advise her and prepare her for the interview on 35.....they were doing "feet" work!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

Vicki's advisers are desperate. They couldn't prepare her for a debate in a million years, and they CAN'T convince voters to support her in the upcoming election. ARREARS FOR YEARS!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >to Frank poster
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

Struck a nerve, huh? You are hit with the truth, and there you are, sputtering a feeble response. Everyone who has ever had anything to do with Frank hates him, huh? Well, a lot of them have yet to say anything here or to Frank's face, so it doesn't really matter. (Whattsamatta, did you teach them how to be faceless cowards like yourself?)

Even if it's true, so what? Frank has learned to go it alone. The treatment he received at the hands of his sadistic classmates taught him that very early. He learned he didn't need approval or love from anyone outside his family to survive. Of course, a lot of Frank's tormentors were involved in that Glen Ridge rape thing, and ruined their own lives. What happened to Frank? Well, he adapted to college and being outside Glen Ridge a lot better than a lot of his classmates did, and worked his way through college. From what I understand, he is currently working on his master's degree in public relations. He's also apparently spoken about going to law school, and has even talked about writing a memoir of his time in high school when the rape case occurred.

All in all, Frank can succeed at whatever he wants to. He can write well, can work for candidates, or do PR for whoever he wants. That infuriates the likes of you. So, you attack him as a homosexual (that macho BS doesn't work in the real world. In the real world you learn to respect differences, not beat up those who are different from you) and attack his wife. Now I don't know how well Frank knows computers, but he has an entire university at his disposal, and could probably find someone who can identify you. What will you do then? Will you be as brave to his face as you are here?

It's obvious you no longer have an audience here, if you ever had one at all. The election will soon be over. With any luck, Burnett will be laughed out of the election, Noland will win his seat(there's nothing wrong with young blood in politics) and the second ward wins no matter who gets in, since Galioto got bounced in the primary. The talk about Frank, Arms, Norton and Sholty will no doubt disappear. The defeated will have to answer to their masters (and we all know who their masters are. Scap, care to answer?). Bloomfield will have a renaissance. Properties will be developed, good people will be put in office and Bob Arms will remain chairman of TV-35.

I'm sure this post is going in one ear and out the other with you (It would figure; there's nothing in between your ears to stop it.) Anyway, I think its time you crawled back under your rock until you think of a response. I'll look for your response in about two years.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >Hooray for the Truth!
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

Way to go, above poster!

I love to read the truth. Thank you!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >To the Frank Poster
< Date: 25-Oct-99 >

That was a ver good and informative post. We need more of them. Frank is a perfect gentleman and his wife a perfect lady. So look in the mirror at yourself and then see if you have the right to critize anyone else. He has become a intelligent adult and writes with such dignity. The person who is constantly picking on him is very crude and rude to say the least. Especially since he/she refuses to identify himself. I can just imagine what SKELETONS YOU have in your closet, writer. We are close to finding out so be careful as to what you say.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 26-Oct-99 >

Frank just keep up the good work you are doing. you are a winner.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 26-Oct-99 >

Speaking of winners.....

Go Maureen, Go!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >Just Curious
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Along with his other afflictions, does Frank suffer from multiple personality disorder?

Just Curious

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Just Curious....Blue Willow....Juliet.....Observer.....Blank....Gary.....

Don't really know? Why don't you explain the disorder?

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Hey, Frank "supporter", the people who had to endure being around you SINCE high school can't stand you either. They were not convicted of rape. Face it, you are a despicable worm. Nobody likes you.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

The above poster comes on with the same old same old whenever the TRUTH appears and can be harmful to Burnett or Daglian!

Duh...do we have a chairman here?

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Amazing how someone responds to our multiple positive posts about Frank by trying to convince us Frank has multiple personality disorder.

That someone just can't believe there are many of us and only one of him/her! Like it or not, Frank has MANY friends and few detractors (and who among us doesn't have at least one detractor?). Frank stands for what is good, intelligent and decent. His detractor is one of the rude & crudes. So much for credibility.

That someone is increasingly desperate as the election grows nearer. S/he keeps posting inane nonsense as a diversion. It won't work. Come Nov. 2, the rest of the rudes & crudes will be history.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Frank you are A great guy and very smart, also you know what is going on so keep up the good work. Remember you have alot of friends in Bloomfild and they will not let you down.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Frank you are A great guy and very smart, also you know what is going on so keep up the good work. Remember you have alot of friends in Bloomfild and they will not let you down.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

Enough of this schoolyard nonsense!

Vote for Maureen ! She pays her taxes, doesn't cuss in public and abhors spandex!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >We the People
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

According to ELEC: "October 19, 1999

On Tuesday, October 26, 1999, at 10:00 a.m., the 11-day preelection reports of 1999 general election candidates and committees will be available on the ELEC web site (www.elec.state.nj.us) and for public inspection at the offices of the New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission (ELEC) at 28 West State Street, 13th floor, in Trenton, New Jersey. "

Gee Whiz! Vicki hasn't filed a report since Oct. 6! She doesn't like that everyone is talking about THAT one! Why doesn't she want us to see THIS one?

Go to www.elec.state.nj.us She has no 11-day report "available!"

Why doesn't she EVER follow the rules?

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 27-Oct-99 >

What happened to Frank's great "revelation" he was going to spring the week before the election? Another toeboy lie.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

Frank? You lied again, didn't you. You promised everyone here a great "revelation" the week before the election. You lied. Again. You are a sap.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

The ELEC commission "promised" to have them all available online by 10 am on Tuesday, 10/26. The other candidates are present and accounted for. Look them up....but not Vicky!

Is there something ELSE that she doesn't want us to know this close to the election?

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

She's either hiding something, or she's irresponsible, or she's thumbing at her nose at Us the People and ELEC, like Gary did a couple of times. Only the little people file ELEC reports?

If that isn't reason to vote for Maureen, I don't know what is!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 28-Oct-99 >

Maureen is a very honest and truthfull woman. She does what is right is every respect of the law and inevery day living. This is the type of person we need on the council. People must realize Bloomfield is going down hill fast and the people on the council right now is doing nothing to stop this problem that Bloomfield has except for our at large council people. We DO NOT have a mayor that gives a damn about Bloomfield plus the fact he just don't know enough about running a town. He is just stupid when it comes to this much responsibility. No way can we afford to have Vicki Burnett sit on our council. Look at how much money the people of Bloomfield pay in taxes. Who could TRUST Vicki to have a say so in any thing that requires spending money for our town. Some people take her not paying her taxes lightly. Well this is a serious problem for some one like Vicki and Greg who want to sit on seats in our town where important issues and decisions must be made. PLEASE THINK YOU PEOPLE IN THE THIRD WARD. mAUREEN will do what is best for us and keep the people of Bloomfield and the people of the third ward in mind before she makes a decision and she has brains enough to make a decision on her own which would be the best decision for all of us. Vicki would be running around like a chicken with her head cut off trying to find out from the mayor (so called) and other council people as to which wat she should vote. Again i ask of you all of us people in the third ward deserve something better than Vicki Burnett. We can give ourselves something much better than her next Tuesday by voting for Maureen.

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

A vote for Maureen is a vote for integrity, experience, leadership and CLASS.

Vicki is C of C administrator? How come her literature says ASSISTANT administrator? Vicki is a realtor for the past eight years? How come the state licensing board doesn't know about it? Vicki files her ELEC reports on time? NO SHE DOESN'T! Vicki pays her TAXES on time? NO SHE HASN'T! Does Vicki deserve your vote? NO SHE DOESN'T!

Go Maureen!

< Subject: RE: A Vote For Maureen is a Vote for ... >
< From: >Third Ward Resident
< Date: 29-Oct-99 >

Afraid of losing your special privileges if Vicki is elected? You have managed to trash Vicki on these threads and demonize the Mayor but it won't work.

Many of us will be voting for VICKI BURNETT IN SPITE OF THE GARBAGE YOU HAVE POSTED ABOUT HER. SHE HAS BEEN ACTIVELY INVOLVED IN THIS TOWN FOR MANY, MANY YEARS. WHAT HAS THAT FAT 60-YEAR OLD WOMAN DONE? NOTHING! SHE WAS GIVEN THAT SEAT BY HER HUSBAND WHO FANCIES HIMSELF A POWER BROKER. HE CANNOT EVEN MAKE HIMSELF UNDERSTOOD WHEN HE READS AT THE MEETINGS!!

VICKI WILL WIN IN NOVEMBER. JUST WAIT AND SEE!