To
the Greek: Freeholder - Palagano- with a
wave coming out of Montclair. 34th district
- Di Gaetano and Kelly 36th district- De
Stefano (wave out of Wayne) and Zecker
Council- Daglian nosing out Noland Decarlo
nosing out Tamborini Esposito crushing
Burnett And there you have IT!
In
order for me to stay in bloomfield, I hope
it's palaganno over scarpelli; esposito over
burnett, noland ( a nice breath of fresh
air) over Daglian, and De Carlo over
Tamborini( though either of them would be
okay). And please God! Destefano over
Marion. I'd like to see zecker out too,
because he seems so closely connected to
Marion, but I'll breath easier with her
gone, no matter which of the other three go
in.
Zecker
is NOT closely connected to Marion, although
he keeps up appearances for the sake of
party unity. Ask him in private and he'll
tell you she's an idiot. Zecker is an
intelligent man and worth you vote.
My
choice for 34th District: Zecker and
DeStefano.
Souls
of the dearly departed rise up for Halloween
and hang around long enough to vote for Big
Mo (the councilwoman not the battleship) led
on by the elitists of the WHNA. Big Mo wins
in a squeaker but loses in a recount that
shows too many dead Dems voted. Wailing and
howling is heard comming for the "beach
house".
Souls
of the dearly departed rise up for Halloween
and hang around long enough to vote for Big
Mouth (the councilwoman wannabe not the
battleship) led on by the elitists of the
Real Repulsives. Big Mouth wins in a
squeaker but loses in a recount that shows
too many dead GOPS voted. Wailing and
howling is heard comming for the South Jr.
High!.
Predictions
for the upcoming election: Assembly:
DeStefano and Zecker, Passaic county rejects
Crecco. Freeholder: Palagano over Dr.
Scarpelli - Montclair and Bloomfield carry
the day for Palagano. 1st Ward: Noland over
Daglian - knocked on every door, twice -
remember Johnnie Crecco campaigns!! 2nd
Ward: DeCarlo over Tamborini - Close but not
as close as people think - DeCarlo made no
enemies other than some Republican
Leadership - 2nd ward in good shape with him
at the helm. Why change a winner! 3rd Ward:
Espostio over Burnett - Taxes, Taxes, Taxes,
if you can't pay your taxes like the rest of
the 3rd ward how can anyone respect your
abilities? No choice as I see it - landslide
if voters vote with any degree of common
sense.
What
happened to the big prediction Frankie made
about a major revelation the week before the
election? What a liar. He insinuates
corruption and nepotism, promises a
"revelation", then wimps out.
What
a loser Frank is! he makes promises, then
disappears. He claims to have things on
people, then never comes across. He is a
stupid and nasty liar. It figures the
Nortons would have him as a pet dog.
Come
on, toeboy. Where is the revelation you
promised? Don't you ever get tired of lying
to insinuate things about others? You are
scum. Lying, disgusting scum.
Frank,
you stood before the flesh zeppelin and said
"I do". Now you have lied in front
of many people, including your owners,
Norton and Arms. Please tell us what great
revelation you have about the people you
have been calling names for months. You
claimed to have "exposed"
corruption and nepotism. You can not show us
one thing you produced that
"exposed" such things. Then you
lied more, and promised some revelation
before the election. Either tell us what you
are going to reveal, or apologize for being
a liar.
You
expect a dishonest liar like him to come
clean? He is scum. He is unable to apologize
or admit he was wrong. That's why it was so
easy for him to tell the whale "I
do".
I
know of no one more self-serving than
Vicki... Unless of course it's Marion.
Are
you discriminating against Yuppies? They
have no rights? You should be down on your
knees and thankful that these people are
investing in the third ward. They'll be your
saviour.
It
does not matter who gets in. They will all
suck! People who would actually try to do a
good job do not run becauase of all the crap
you bastards would put them through. The
folks who do run are in it for themselves
and their personal agendas. It is a shame
what we have become.
< Subject: RE:
ELECTION PREDICTIONS > < From: >Wind In His Hair < Date: 29-Oct-99 >
There's
an attitude that made democracy worth dying
for!
New
revelation: Dems sweep the assembly in the
34th. A shocker to Crecco and Zecker. If you
are going to steal your oponents signs,
don't get caught and certainly don't get
caught by a photographer. Anyone see the
photo of Zecker in the Record yesterday,
stealing DiStafano signs? In the Freeholder
race: Palagano over Dr. Joe - she adjusts
his spine rather violently by taking
Montclair and Bloomfield Big Time. Ward
Seats: 1st Ward: Noland over Daglian by less
than 50 votes. Second Ward: was a pickem but
DeCarlo came on very strong in the last
several months, DeCarlo over Tamborinni by
several hundred votes in the lowest voter
turnout in 2nd ward history. 3rd Ward:
Esposito in a walk. Burnett can't pay her
taxes, and wants to tell residents how to
spend their tax monies? Only one candidate
in the third ward Esposito. Dems look good
in Bloomfield!!!
Vicki
did NOT pay her taxes on time, did NOT file
her ELEC report on time, did NOT engage a
volunteer as campaign treasurer (the reports
and phone calls are being handled on taxayer
time), did NOT care about Floyd flood
victims, does NOT work in real estate (no
license on file with the state board), does
NOT work in a real job with the C of
C...does NOT have any business running for
council.
Everyone
picked on me cause I was a jerk in school. I
always made stupid power plays, and people
were able to con me and use me. Then one
day, only a few of these people got a
conviction for a crime. That makes me a
genius and everyone who ever ever ever
picked on me a felon by isinuation.
< Subject: RE:
ELECTION PREDICTIONS > < From: >Stick to the issue < Date: 31-Oct-99 >
< Subject: RE:
ELECTION PREDICTIONS > < From: >Stick to the issue < Date: 31-Oct-99 >
Every
time someone strikes a nerve and says
something that will hurt Vicki.
Someone
else posts about Frank. Who cares about
Frank????
Don't
try to change the subject. Frank isn't
running for election in Bloomfield.
He
doesn't even live here.
The
issue is to stop the election of Vicki. All
that is written here about her late taxes
and her use of a board of education
Secretary for campaign Treasurer is TRUE
TRUE TRUE TRUE
Vicki
will lose to honesty, integrity and sanity.
Vicki will lose to Maureen Esposito.
Im
tired of increasing taxes.Unlike the other
fools on here I dont forget when it comes to
who voted to raise my TAXES. The $10
Million-Dolar Woman Freeloader Palagano
VOTES VOTED VOTED to raise your county TAXES
TAXES TAXES by TEN-MILLION DOLLARS LAST
FISCAL YEAR. Then for election year politics
votes against the same county budget which
again raised taxes in 1/2 the freeholder
district while the other half didnt get an
increase. Can Freeloader/Municipal Clerk
Palagano do anything beside sit at the pulic
taxpayer fed trough like an old cow
colecting over $90,000 a year plus bennies.
If we dont get the old cow away from the
trough what will it cost the taxpayers in
pension 20 years down the road??? Will we be
working longer hours to pay the pensions of
career political whores like Freeloader
Palagano and her POLITCAL
"GODMOTHER" Marion. Yes Marion has
been playing "footsie" with the
DEMS again so send her a message and why not
"JUST SAY NO" to Marion and the
Marionettes.
Assembly:
DISTEFANO and Zecker (Ruane hasn't got it)
FREEHOLDER:
PALAGANO ANY TIME!
FIRST
WARD: TENANTS WILL OVERWHELMINGLY ELECT
CHARLIE DAGLIAN. Homeowners don't trust the
inexperienced boy.
SECOND
WARD: TAMBORINI
THIRD
WARD: Voters disgusted with the libelous
attacks and negative fliers will
overwhelmingly elect VICKI.
Karen,
young Nortons and supporters, Chairman Bob,
and Town sycophants working against the
taxpayers, pack your bags. Please move to
Toms Rivers or Brick.
< From: >A member of the
community < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
The elections
are over. We could sit and talk about why Noland could not
unseat Daglian, why Vicky defeated Maureen or why Tamborini
defeated DeCarlo. The truth is that none of us really know.
The important
thing for the future of Bloomfield is that we all try to use
this as a starting point for working together. People are not
interested in petty infighting or wise guy politics. The past
election should be an indicator of that. Those that resort to
that kind of activity should be smart enough to know that you
will not suceed. The truth is that the people always seem to
get it right. That is the promise and the wonder of American
democracy. People are not campaigh fighters, they are member
of communities that they want to be stable and peaceful.
To all those
that won - congradulations. Please continue to work for ALL of
the people of Bloomfield.
To those that
participated in the unfortunate postings on this website,
please try to put away your hostilities and begin to work for
a Better Brighter Bloomfield. If you feel the urge to come on
to this site and throw barbs be reminded of that biblical
passage that warns that he who trounles his own house shall
inherit the wind. Perhaps that will help you to avoid such
activities.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >A member of the community < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
The elections
are over. We could sit and talk about why Noland could not
unseat Daglian, why Vicky defeated Maureen or why Tamborini
defeated DeCarlo. The truth is that none of us really know.
The important
thing for the future of Bloomfield is that we all try to use
this as a starting point for working together. People are not
interested in petty infighting or wise guy politics. The past
election should be an indicator of that. Those that resort to
that kind of activity should be smart enough to know that you
will not succeed. The truth is that the people always seem to
get it right. That is the promise and the wonder of American
democracy. People are not campaign fighters, they are member
of communities that they want to be stable and peaceful.
To all those
that won - congratulations. Please continue to work for ALL of
the people of Bloomfield.
To those that
participated in the unfortunate postings on this website,
please try to put away your hostilities and begin to work for
a Better Brighter Bloomfield. If you feel the urge to come on
to this site and throw barbs be reminded of that biblical
passage that warns that he who troubles his own house shall
inherit the wind. Perhaps that will help you to avoid such
activities.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
Well said.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >Kevin Noland < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
I just wanted to
agree with the post above and thank my parents who really
showed me that it was more important to lose the election and
keep my integrity than to win at any cost. I would also like
to thank all the people who helped my campaign or had
encouraging words to say to me. Sincerely, Kevin Noland
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
Kevin there is a
place for you if you still want to serve Bloomfield.
You have a lot
to offer and I think you can keep yourself out of the petty
politics. Hope you continue to attend council meetings and
give input into the process.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >Class Act < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
Too bad I'm in
the 3rd Ward because I would have voted for someone like you.
We wern't given much of a choice. At least the 1st and 2nd
Ward candidates proved to be people of substance and integrity
and addressed issues and concerns. Our candidates in the 3rd
Ward relied and who could influence the most people to vote
for them regardless of what they claimed to be or could do.
Congratulations Kevin for showing the people of Bloomfield
what dignity is. Hope to see you run in the next election.
Your parents and the township of Bloomfield are proud to have
you as a resident.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >3rd Ward Resident < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
To: Kevin,
I agree with the
posters above. Why don't you consider running for the Board of
Ed in the meantime? We need a fresh new voice and one with
intelligence and integrity.
Good luck to you
in the future. Stay in Bloomfield and help change the system.
(a friend of
Mary's)
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
Ditto to the
above sentiments. Heard there will be quite a few open BOE
seats coming up. A legal mind with an opposing political
viewpoint would be welcomed. Please think about it.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >3rd Ward resident < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
I also must
agree with the sentiments of the first posting. But I also
want to add this comment: As a resident of the 3rd ward, I
feel compelled to appologize to the residents of the 1st and
2cnd wards for whom we are sending to the town council. Please
don't hold this against us forever! Our day will come
eventually when we can also hope to contibute to the viability
of this community. It just won't happen as soon as I had
hoped.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >to 3rd Ward resident < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
See that is the
kind of stuff that gets the 3rd Ward a bad reputation. Already
you started with a new line of bickering.
Can't you stop?
Try and work together against yourselves. We are all one town.
Act like it and demand it from your representatives.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
It's a shame
that there is constant bickering going on. Please, Town
Council, all work together and not each for himself/herself.
That is what has been going on. Turn over a new leaf - WORK
TOGETHER FOR THE BENEFIT OF BLOOMFIELD. Just try it!!!
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >To: Third Ward Resident < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >To: Third Ward Resident < Date: 03-Nov-99 >
I respect you
and accept your apology. It's difficult to accept the things
we can't control. The 1st and 2nd ward Council winners may not
be the greatest, but I must admit I am not embarrassed by
them. You, on the other hand, are going to be the target of
criticism. I won't blame you personally, but I will blame the
people of the third ward who voted without thinking. Your
thoughtless vote affects me and my community.
I was talking to
someone today who wants to change the election of WARD council
seats to all AT-LARGE seats. There is a way to change the
charter. If you are interested let's start a thread here. It
just isn't fair that we didn't have the right to vote for or
against Vicki Burnett, but she gets the right to vote on
issues affecting the 1st and 2nd wards.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 04-Nov-99 >
Vicki should
have to come clean, expose her faulty tax paying records, make
amends and MAKE PAYMENTS before taking the oath.
Otherwise, what
good is it?
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 04-Nov-99 >
But she won't.
She is a NON-CONTRIBUTOR to the community in more ways than
one. I sincerely wish the residents of the third ward well and
wish them luck for the coming three years. They'll need it.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 04-Nov-99 >
The two big
problems we have in Bloomfield is Marion Crecco and Vicki
Burnett. With Vicki we must live with her for 3 years and with
the other for 2 years. There are things that can be done to
keep them from getting their way about every thing. Also
remember Charlie and Marion will have a big say so as to what
goes on in Bloomfield.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 04-Nov-99 >
The two big
problems we have in Bloomfield is Marion Crecco and Vicki
Burnett. With Vicki we must live with her for 3 years and with
the other for 2 years. There are things that can be done to
keep them from getting their way about every thing. Also
remember Charlie and Marion will have a big say so as to what
goes on in Bloomfield.
< Subject: RE: Open Letter To
Bloomfield > < From: >Freak Show < Date: 04-Nov-99 >
Are
all you Bloomfield residents as pathetic as you seem here? I
mean you are publicly adding to your image of being ignorant,
loud mouthed, big-haired fools. Don't get me wrong. I enjoy
the laughs your providing us with but have you no pride?
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >Does no one care?? < Date: 04-Nov-99 >
Last
night there was an open forum discussion presented by the
Bloomfield Center Alliance, Bloomfield College, and the
Atlantic Group, to talk about about the future direction of
the center as it relates to their ongoing study.
Unfortunately, only about 50 people bothered to show up to
express their views. And guess how many of our current elected
officials were there. Zero! Not one official for such an
important forum. Kevin Noland was there, as was Vicki Burnett,
and although I didn't vote for either candidate I respect and
admire their decision to attend. Even Glen Ridge thought the
meeting important enough to send a representative.
But
to everyone else who has a vested interest in this community -
where were you? We have all heard the constant complaining
concerning the general appearance and condition of our center
and we were, at last, presented with a rare opportunity to
make our voices heard. Many good suggestions and thoughts were
presented during the meeting, but I was quite disappointed
that so few would take advantage of such an opportunity.
Whether you live in the 1st, 2cnd or 3rd wards, this topic
directly impacts your life. Even if you never set foot in the
center - it affects your property values and tax rate and
therefore should matter.
Perhaps
the first forum was poorly advertized. There will be another
forum presented in February to present the final
recommendations by this group. The public will again be
invited and encouraged to provide feedback. Please urge your
township rep's to keep their constituents informed on this
important process, as well as making a better effort yourself
to attend the next meeting - if you care.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >We care < Date: 04-Nov-99 >
We
care. Why was this meeting kept a secret? Where was it
advertised?
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >concerned < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
You
know I have been reading this forum for awhile and I comment
that this has got to be one of the best threads I have seen...
No attacking, No low blows, No blood threats, wow.... I enjoy
this. Think as a town we can keep at least one thread here as
is. Nothing but positive remarks... this is great. I hope
others feel the same if so let us keep it up and let no one
influnce this. For once lets work together and prove we can.
My complements to those that have already posted and I
encourage others to join. Let us attempt to take out town back
and let all know that this is still a town to live in....
thanks again to all....
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >TO: Does no one care? < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
Not
one official? Who conducted the meeting? And I wonder, what
did Vicki &/or Kevin contribute?
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >It was advertised < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
It
was advertised in the paper and elementary kids came home with
a notice. I couldn't get a sitter so can you please give a
condensed version of what was discussed?
Thanks.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >A member of the community < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
I
am happy to see that this thread is still doing well.
As
for the Bloomfield Center Alliance meeting let me tell you
that it was an interesting one. There appears to be some
movement towards improving the center by people who have some
experience in doing that. They have asked for input from the
people in the community and we should take them at face value.
I do have some issues but they are more in the area of my
preceptions of the Alliance and their public image then with
their stated goals. For now I will reserve judgement and hope
that it is only my preception that is incorrect.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
Citizens
of Bloomfield, I ask that we begin a movement to change our
charter in the next election so that by the next Ward council
elections, we will not have what we had this election. Let all
people in Bloomfield have a say as to who sits on the Council.
If a ward council representative can vote on all matters in
the town, everyone in the town should have a vote to put them
there. We should draft a referendum to either make all council
seats "at-large" or allow all wards to vote on each
others candidates with the home ward votes counted as 2 votes
and votes outside the ward counting as one. In either case,
the ward council representatives will need to campaign for
votes throughout the town, not just concentrate on their one
home ward. Let's see if someone steps forward to head this
move.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >A member of the community < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
I
don't think that is legal. Maybe a non-partisan election is
the answer?
At
any rate we have to demand the best of those that represent
us. Look at the other threads. That kind of mean spirited
nasty name-calling is one of the reasons we have the kind of
politicians that we do. Only they can survive such attacks.
Good men & women have abandoned politics in Bloomfield
because they would rather contribute to the community in a
small way rather then cope with that kind of activity.
We
have to attract the best candidates by letting would-be
candidates know that attacks on their reputation as part of
business as usual will no be tolerated. We have to let our
elected officials that we expect them to do their jobs and we
will not tolerate the bickering and letters to the editors
that we have seen as part of the past year's events.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
Maybe
it is time to divide our little community into more manageable
parts!?
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
The
Second Ward should form its own town - secede from the 1st and
3rd wards. Just don't ask Ray to do the petitions.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >1105 < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
Maybe
it is time to divide your little head into more managable
parts.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >To: A member of the community < Date: 05-Nov-99 >
Yes
it is legal and in my humble opinion, it's very necessary.
I
am currently researching the proper procedure to change our
Charter to all at-large council members. Then the whole town
will have a vote on every council memb It's insane that a
council person can vote on issues affecting my neighborhood
when no one in my neighborhood could vote for or against that
council person. Join us!
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >To member < Date: 06-Nov-99 >
Thanks
for the update about the meeting. One thing confuses me. Since
the buildings are privately/commercially owned, how can the
citizens impact what types of businesses they are rented to?
The variety, or lack of it, of retail concerns seems to be one
of the center's downfalls. The selection currently available,
does not attract the average shopper. I do not see how owners
could be influenced to turn away businesses willing to rent
emply storefronts. Was this addressed?
Thank
you.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: > < Date: 06-Nov-99 >
You're
right--property owners can rent to any types of businesses
they wish, so long as those businesses are legal. The Alliance
or another committee could make suggestions, but that's about
it. Of course, concerned citizens can express their opinions
via letters to the editor, etc., and perhaps influence an
owner's or potential tenant's decision that way, pro or con.
I
think eventually the marketplace will dictate what types of
businesses occupy the Center. For example, sooner or later
nail salons will reach a "saturation point" (if they
haven't already) because there won't be enough customers to
support more salons. The other types of businesses will move
in.
Another
important factor is the need to patronize local stores. Alow
them to make a profit so they CAN stay in business. Residents
were clamoring for a book store, and now we have one. Use it!
Tell your friends about it! Try that store before
automatically heading for Barnes & Noble!
Maybe
a "winner's circle" of desirable businesses would
encourage others to move in and stay.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >A member of the community < Date: 06-Nov-99 >
I
did not explain myself correctly in my last post. What I
should have said is that the idea of a position on the council
that would have two votes would not be legal. I am quite sure
you can got to an all at-large council.
As
for the Bloomfield Center Alliance, I think they can do all
the fine work in the world but if the plan is not in keeping
with the wants and needs of the community or if the community
is not brought along in the process than that work is lost.
One
thing is clear. That is that we need a viable business center.
I believe we are in a good location and we have talent right
here in town to make that happen. What we are lacking is the
ability to collaborate. That is unfortunate and expensive.
There are state agencies that would actually give us money to
develop our community if we only worked together. They have
told us that. The trick is to encourage people who will
partner to step up to the plate and get involved in the town.
People
and organizations that see this project as only their project
will be the reason that this effort will not get off the
ground. Currently there are people who are actively working to
undermine efforts to improve the center just because certain
others are involved in the process. That is not helpful. On
the other hand there are people and organizations who are
involved in the process who have put up barriers to success by
excluding people who they think do not fit their plans. This
also is detrimental.
As
I said before the trick is for us all to work together on this
one. It is the most important thing we can do.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >Kevin Noland < Date: 06-Nov-99 >
Can
we organize a day for a volunteer litter pick up in Bloomfield
Center. I think since people seem to be so concerned with the
appearance of the Center that we should be able to get a group
of concerned citizens together once a month to show that they
care. Also, I am going to try to do some of my Holiday
Shopping in the Center as well. Where is the new book store
that was mentioned. My father is an avid reader I am sure he
would be interested to know about it.
<
Subject: RE: Open Letter To Bloomfield > < From: >Rose < Date: 06-Nov-99 >
Before
organizing any campaign for at-large-council seats, you should
present a clear explanation of why this would be to the Town's
advantage.
I
am quite happy with the current setup because there are three
Council members who are accountable to their specific wards.
The "member of the community" who apologized for
sending Vicki Burnett to Town Council has no right to speak
for those of us who voted for her. I too live in the third
ward and VOTED for Vicki.
Vicki
should be given a chance to prove that she can deliver on some
of the promises she made to those who voted for her: Strict
code enforcement, walking patrols in the Ampere/Watsessing
Ave. section, and no tax increases. That can be accomplished
by cutting back on superfluous "political" jobs in
Town Hall, issuing heavy fines to slum lords, and embarking on
a serious plan of regionalization of municipal services. If we
want to keep our taxes down, we must develop a plan to share
vital municipal services on a regional basis.
I do not
want some elitest fool who is angry at having lost her
"privileges" disparaging Mrs. Burnett or the rest of
us. There are some very intelligent citizens in the Third Ward
who did vote for Vicki. We realize she has limitations, but
she is no different from any of you. At least she is willing
to listen and learn. GIVE HER A CHANCE!